Rubric-linked findings
Understanding ratings are organized around the dimensions instructors define. Each dimension gets its own score, evidence excerpts, and confidence level.
EVIDENCE REPORTS
Reports that explain why a decision is supported
A Pruuva report is built for review, appeals, feedback, and recordkeeping. It connects what the student submitted to what they demonstrated under follow-up, organized around your rubric.
Quoted evidence
Transcript excerpts and artifact references show the source of every finding. Teachers can inspect the basis for each recommendation, not just accept a number.
Separate concern types
Comprehension gaps, session integrity events, and technical issues are separated so teachers can review each concern in its own context.
Anatomy of an evidence report
Every Pruuva report follows the same structure. The summary shows overall comprehension, per-rubric dimension scores, and the strongest and weakest evidence at a glance.
Below the summary, each rubric dimension has its own section: the score, the AI's confidence level, the specific transcript excerpts that support the score, and any flags for gaps or inconsistencies.
The full transcript follows, timestamped and searchable. The instructor can read exactly what the student said, when they said it, and how they responded to follow-up probes.
Finally, the report includes session metadata: duration, response mode, integrity signals, and any technical events. Everything an instructor or review committee needs to evaluate the evidence in context.
HOW IT FITS
Built around the evidence instructors need to trust a decision.
01 / Summary
See the pattern quickly
Reports surface the strongest evidence, weakest evidence, uncertainty, and suggested review priorities in a format instructors can scan in under a minute.
02 / Detail
Inspect the support
Read transcript excerpts, review topic coverage, compare responses with rubric bands, and open the original artifact. Everything is linked and navigable.
03 / Export
Keep a defensible record
PDF and CSV exports support gradebooks, pilot reporting, appeals, accreditation records, and institutional review. The record outlasts the semester.
HOW INSTRUCTORS USE REPORTS
Evidence reports in practice
Grading with confidence
Review the report alongside the submission. The rubric-linked scores and excerpts give you a structured basis for the grade, especially when the artifact alone leaves questions.
Appeals and integrity reviews
When a grade or integrity decision is questioned, point to the specific transcript excerpts, rubric scores, and annotations in the evidence report. The record is timestamped and attributable.
Student feedback
Share selected findings with students to show where their understanding was strong and where gaps appeared. The report makes feedback specific rather than generic.
Pilot evaluation
Aggregate evidence patterns across students and sections to evaluate whether capability evidence improves grading confidence during a pilot.
Accreditation documentation
Export evidence reports as part of accreditation submissions to demonstrate that assessments produce reviewable proof of student learning outcomes.
Department-level review
Compare evidence patterns across sections and semesters to identify where capability gaps cluster and whether assessments are producing evidence of learning.
USE THIS WHEN
The question is not only whether work was submitted.
Use Pruuva when a grade, appeal, pilot, or academic-integrity review needs evidence that the learner can explain the submitted work in context.
The evidence needs to be reviewable later.
Pruuva keeps the artifact, follow-up, rubric findings, and instructor decision together so educators can revisit why a decision was made.
COMPARE YOUR CURRENT APPROACH
See how evidence-based assessment differs from the tools you may already use.
AI DETECTION ALTERNATIVE
When the report needs to explain the decision
Compare Pruuva with AI detection tools when faculty need quoted evidence, rubric alignment, and a reviewable record instead of a probability score.
Compare AI detection alternativesTURNITIN ALTERNATIVE
When similarity reports leave questions
See how evidence reports differ from similarity scores when the grading question is whether the student understands the submitted work.
Compare Turnitin alternativesFULL COMPARISON GUIDE
Choose the right integrity path
Review all comparisons if you are deciding between detectors, proctoring tools, lockdown browsers, and evidence-based assessment.
View all comparisonsCOMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently asked questions
What format are evidence reports in?
Reports are viewable in the grading workspace and exportable as PDF (individual students) or CSV (class-wide grades with per-rubric scores).
Can I share a report with a student?
Yes. You control when and what students see. You can release full reports, selected findings, or keep reports internal for instructor and institutional use only.
How long are evidence reports retained?
Retention follows your institution's configured policies. Reports are available for the instructor's review period and can be exported before archival.
Do reports include the full transcript?
Yes. The full timestamped transcript is included, with quoted excerpts linked to specific rubric dimensions for quick navigation.
RELATED PRUUVA RESOURCES