Submission beside evidence
The student's artifact and the evidence panel sit side by side. No more switching between reports, files, downloads, and notes.
GRADING WORKSPACE
Keep instructor judgment at the center
Pruuva does not replace the teacher. It organizes the artifact, follow-up evidence, rubric, AI suggestions, annotations, and decision history so grading can happen with full context in one screen.
Rubric scoring with context
Each rubric dimension shows AI suggestions with confidence levels, supporting transcript excerpts, and band selection. Score with the evidence visible.
Overrides are first-class
Adjust any AI suggestion, record your rationale, annotate the work directly, and make the final integrity and grade decisions. Your judgment is the source of truth.
How the grading workspace fits your review process
The grading workspace is where evidence becomes a decision. After Pruuva generates the evidence report, you open the workspace to review it alongside the original submission.
On the left: the student's artifact. On the right: the evidence panel with per-rubric scores, transcript excerpts, and integrity signals. Below: annotation tools, grading controls, and the integrity decision.
The workspace is designed for the realistic grading workflow: scan the summary, dig into specific rubric dimensions where you have questions, annotate passages, override AI suggestions where you disagree, and finalize your decision. The entire process takes 3 to 5 minutes per student.
HOW IT FITS
Built around the evidence instructors need to trust a decision.
01 / Review
Read the work and evidence together
Open the submission, evidence summary, transcript excerpts, session context, and rubric in a single flow. The workspace highlights areas that need attention.
02 / Decide
Score, annotate, and override
Use AI suggestions as evidence, not authority. Select rubric bands for each dimension. Add inline annotations. Override any score with your own assessment and rationale.
03 / Release
Export or return results
Finalize grades, export records as PDF or CSV, and control when students see feedback. The decision record is preserved for future reference.
INSTRUCTOR CONTROL
The grading workspace is built around one principle: the instructor makes the decision.
AI suggestions are suggestions
Confidence scores and evidence citations for each rubric dimension. The AI shows its reasoning so you can agree, adjust, or override with full context.
Annotations persist
Inline highlights, comments, and notes are saved with the evidence record. They become part of the defensible grading history.
Override history is tracked
Every adjustment to an AI suggestion is recorded with a timestamp and the instructor's rationale. The record shows how the decision was made.
Integrity decisions are explicit
Mark each submission as Accepted, Needs Review, or Referred, with space for notes. No ambiguity about the instructor's conclusion.
WORKFLOW EXAMPLES
How instructors use the grading workspace
Routine grading
Scan the evidence summary, confirm AI suggestions match your assessment, adjust where needed, and move to the next student. The workspace makes routine grading faster without sacrificing depth.
Integrity concerns
When the evidence flags a concern, the workspace shows exactly which rubric dimensions have low confidence and which transcript excerpts raised the flag. Review the evidence before making the integrity decision.
Detailed feedback
Use annotation tools to highlight specific passages, add inline comments, and reference evidence findings. Students see specific, evidence-backed feedback instead of generic notes.
Review queue management
Sort students by evidence strength, flag status, or rubric dimension scores. Focus your review time on the submissions that need the most attention.
USE THIS WHEN
The question is not only whether work was submitted.
Use Pruuva when a grade, appeal, pilot, or academic-integrity review needs evidence that the learner can explain the submitted work in context.
The evidence needs to be reviewable later.
Pruuva keeps the artifact, follow-up, rubric findings, and instructor decision together so educators can revisit why a decision was made.
COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently asked questions
How long does it take to grade one student in the workspace?
Most reviews take 3 to 5 minutes. The evidence summary and AI suggestions let you focus on the rubric dimensions that need your attention rather than re-reading the entire submission.
Can I grade without looking at the AI suggestions?
Yes. AI suggestions are visible but not required. You can score every rubric dimension manually, using only the evidence excerpts and transcript as reference.
What if I disagree with the AI's assessment?
Override it. Select a different rubric band, add your rationale, and the override is recorded in the evidence history. Your decision is always final.
Can multiple instructors or TAs use the workspace?
Yes. Access controls let you assign grading responsibilities. Each grader's decisions and annotations are tracked separately within the evidence record.
RELATED PRUUVA RESOURCES